Snap poll: Did you know that PUBMED and a lot of the NCBI gives you the ability to create custom RSS feed around just about any query
My Answer : Yes I do ..but I learnt about this feature very recently, and I have been using PUBMED for years. You can watch how this feature works from this screencast .
The point is that the bio-search space has and continues to see variations to the theme of search. A lot of these offerings seem to be mere duplications of functionality already present at the EBI and NCBI. While this is a good thing and only through such attempts will we arrive at a “Google”( in the verb sense) for biosearch.
I sometimes wonder if it would just be more worthwhile for atleast the career scientists among us, to learn how to use NCBI and EBI first. Then maybe private research dollars could be diverted to tackle the harder problems in bio-search .
References: Helia seraches PUBMED/MEDLINE
I remember being particularly amazed at Jonathan Harris and Seepandar Kamwars “We feel fine” visualization based on extracted statements from blog posts around the world. Reading about the re-emergence of dengue fever , chicken-gunya , west-nile and other viruses across South Asia, I started wondering if there are ways of keeping track of emerging pathogens using the many social networks that span the Globe.
In many countries there is no paranoia associated with sharing health information like there exists in the developed world. Even if the paranoia exists like it does in the US. We are curiously caught in a world where people reading my blog are more likely to know I have contracted the flu than any two of my healthcare providers who need that information to treat me better.
While the debate on the best way to handle health information online continues, I was wondering how open I would be to sharing information about what afflicts me, if there was a societal benefit to be derived from it. It could something as simple as monitoring allergy symptoms around where I live or something fancy like tracking an emerging pathogen.
Imagine all of us updating a common channel with “de-personalized” information on what afflicts us globally. I can imagine the system to be something like this ..I could “submit” to this service information about what ails me ..and the machine could obfuscate my details , preserving only things like my approximate geographical area and my age and sex and add it to this health information social network.
If implemented well could possibly then have daily visualizations along the lines of “We feel fine” to possibly something like “We feel chicken Gunya”
Just yesterday I was reading tiagos blog where he requested hosting for a computational intensive bioinformatics web-app that he wrote. The application queries and sytematizes mitochondrial genome information from entrez databases, and I assume would be quite useful to animal geneticists and ecologists. Tiago is physically moving institutes and his blog posts talks of his fears of how the app might die if his personal computer goes down.
In one of my personal projects , I have been wrestling with cloning kappa light chains from several monoclonal antibodies that I generated. The cloning required a good knowledge of the anitbody light and heavy chain leader sequences . Several papers I was reading reference the Kabat and Wu database, which catalogs the thousands of sequences of antibodies and other immunological proteins from mouse and humans . Sadly the links to the Kabat and Wu database in some of these papers does not point to any meaningful location. The resulting google and pubmed searches to find this lost data greatly increased the time and effort required to design my cloning experiments.
Which brings me to my question.
In an era when we have free wiki hosting , 4 GB free email access , supercomputers that power maps , gigabyte large free image sharing applications, $6 per month, terabyte bandwidth web hosting. Why are we still so far from an advertisement supported “free” app host for meaningful scientific data ?
Perhaps its because only a few thousand people who are saving a rare turtle species somewhere on this planet will find tiagos web-app useful..Surely thats not yet worth enterprise level attention, or maybe we should all just write our web apps to run off facebook!
Well I had talked about how Deepak went to SciFoo recently. It turns out that some of this years SciFoo alumni led by the indomitable Jean Claude Bradley (JCB or Horace Moody ) started the “metaverse” version of these sessions on the Nature Island on Second Life called Second Nature.
In keeping with the “non conference” format of the original, session themes at SciFoo Lives On are decided on by the attendants , in this case on the wiki that serves as its permanent home outside of Second Life. Yesterdays session was on the role of “Video in Science” and of course we were there with Deepak as Whitewizard Chemistry and myself as Vishwaroop Baroque.
As I awkwardly bumped into the attendees thanks to my terrible gaming skills , the whitewizard chemistry told the audience about bioscreencast.com. This was followed by a talk by JCB on “YouTube and the Sciences” and finally one from someone at the SciVee project.
This was my first time in Second Life. I entered as a skeptic, since I always thought second Life is just a toy for gaming geeks and uber nerds. But I must say the poster session was just like the real thing with some added benefits. Like in the real thing, the questions made the poster session come alive but this time you get a text transcript of all conversations that took place and an overall rich experience. Not to mention the fact that the poster lives on on the NPG island and does not end up in my lab storage area ( read trash can).
I came away convinced that activities like this have a great value in enriching the online scientific experience.
Bertalan, one of the attendees, live blogged the event. You can catch also read about the goings on at Deepaks bbgm blog and of course on the bioscreencast.com blog.
A full text transcript is available on Jean Claude Bradleys blog
Nature just launched Nature precedings , a home for Pre-publication research and preliminary findings. Within seconds of browsing through its very intuitive interface I immediately got the purpose of this offering from Nature Publishing group.
The way it works is simple- you can upload content in the form of word documents , powerpoint files and pdf files and it gets released to the community after a preliminary check for appropriateness of content and suitability for the nature precedings audience. Signed up users can then vote on the content ( a la Digg) and it gets moves up or down its category. All of the content is also search-able and link-able and citeable.
As the help pages suggest, I hope the site serves , in the least as a repository of supplementary material and science findings related to published work anywhere, which can then be commented on and discussed.
More interestingly the FAQ page, informs us that the Nature publishing group Journals do accept material that is in the un-peer-reviewed form and that has appeared in the preprint form : So if i get together a manuscript , I can first post it on Nature precedings and then send it for consideration to Nature for review separately and nature would still consider it ( if it meets its other criteria of course).
So this site could be a great place to establish the provenance of ideas, i.e I have a great new finding , I am gutsy enough to write it up in some form , post it on Nature precedings ..and then a few months later send the finished work to a print journal like a Nature publishing group journal that would accept it.
With all of this Nature precedings has the great potential to become an online repository of pre-print findings , supplementary material and other content of use to the science community…I really cant wait for the first paper to make it from Nature Precedings to the real thing , Nature itself with a citation that first appeared online!.
Powered by ScribeFire.
I have recently started attending the Berkman Centre Thursday Blog group meetings. The meetings which are open to the general public were started many years ago by Dave Winer and colleagues and are loosely structured to discuss topics related to blogging, the social web and also recently ( since I have been attending) entrepreneurial activity in the web 2.0 space from local startups .
At the meeting I heard from Mike Walsh of a conference to be organized by the center titled , University- knowledge beyond authority.
The conference aims to “generate questions, insight and solutions from diverse perspectives across the landscape of University, with a focus on the role of University as an institution.We seek to establish University as a collective force much like ‘Government’ or ‘Private Enterprise’ in its ability to negotiate and compromise for our needs in the digital environment.”
The conference has several sessions dealing with topics ranging from fair use , open-access to discussing the relationships between “University” and library and the RIAA.
The concept of University it seems is to organize thought and opinion on these topics from an educational perspective. Since I know very little about the complex world of licensing , and the DMCA is almost a four letter word to me, it will be fun to listen to how this concept of University evolves at University.
Powered by ScribeFire.